Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:35:31 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<20.88.03313.A1D2E9D4@louvi-msg> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Ron,
1005 is the number.
73 Keith-wa9dro
Keith Reedy
Click the link below to download MP3's of Keith Reedy's music as a gift from Bibles For The Blind.
http://biblesfortheblind.org/download_music.shtml
God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him. J Hudson Taylor.
On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Ron Yearns wrote:
> For some reason I remember reading, listening , to a few months old QST
> where they were saying the 468 didn't hold in all cases. I also took 80
> meters times 39 and then divided by 12 and got within decimal points of the
> same numbers. I know 39 inches isn't exactly the number of inches in a
> meter but amazing how close it came out.
> Man using 1005 calls for 279 feet that's 19 feet longer than the other way.
> Almost a ten percent difference.
> Maybe it's going to come down to cut and try with the antenna analyzer.
> Ron
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walt Sebastian" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: antenna lengths
>
>
>> Hi Ron,
>> For some reason or another the formula for the loop is 1005 divided by
>> frequency. I hope this helps.
>>
>>
>>
>> Walt
>> WA4QXT
>> Groton CT
>> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|