 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:16:31 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<E92F45ABB72342EBB4885B9EE968D364@JohnMillerPC> |
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
<17.20.30001.B8E3E7D4@louvi-msg> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My theory, anything said by a politician, is not true.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax
> Actually, I think Richard Nixon was the first one to tout it as something
> that would conserve energy.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 21:30
> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax
>
>
>> because Bush probably believed it was true lol.
>> As I remember it, GW Bush was the first to market it as energy saving or
>> some such garbage.
>> 73
>> Colin, V A6BKX
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 6:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax
>>
>>
>>> If the 24 world wide time zones were good enough for an international
>>> treaty
>>> then they are good enough now. And I do think DST was started during
>>> World
>>> War Ii because it was originally called war time. But like Steve said,
>>> it's
>>> not an energy saver, so why falsely market it as such?
>>> Harvey
>>
|
|
|
