That seems like an awfully lot of expensive work just to look at an old
stone, I should think the money could be better spent elsewhere. All
stones are old and if you've seen one you've seen 'em all. Ruth
At 9:25 AM -0400 3/26/12, Orgrease wrote:
c,
Very thin slices of stone affixed to microscope slides and then they are
looked at very closely, in this case likely to an analysis of the mineral
composition of the marbles.
John Walsh would be a good person for you to interview in respect of
getting a very tiny view of building facades.
Ken
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Dummerston, VT
--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>