BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:07:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
    Dave:

I have a III., and think the II. is definitely better, especially for what 
AM DXing we can still do today.

This is why I hate to get rid of the II.

Plus, I think the II. sounds much better, and is easier to listen to than 
the III.

Will see what I can do here.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Marthouse" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Slightly Off Topic: G E Super II. Radio Availability?


> Hi Tom,
>
> I don't know about the availability of the Ge Super 2 but the Super 3 can 
> be
> had new.  I don't have any web sites that you can check but a search of
> Google would I'm sure yield good results.
>
> The Super 2 has been discontinued a few years back in favor of the 3.  The 
> 3
> is a good radio but there is a good consensus of people that think the 2 
> was
> a better dx machine.
>
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> [log in to unmask]
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2