BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 May 2011 09:47:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Nice Job, Gary.  If they hear from enough of us, they'll take it seriously. 
We can't let them forget we're out here.  lou
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:35 AM
Subject: message sent to elecraft concerning the k3 and kx3


>I sent the following message to Wayne Burdick just a little bit ago.
>
> I must say, I have been disappointed in elecraft's provision of access for
> the k3.
> However, maybe this will bare some fruit.
>
> Sir:
> Would you please add cw feedback like the kx1 to the kx3?  If so, I'll 
> buy.
> Also, since it is pretty clear that there will be no independent
> non-computer access to the k3, would it be possible to do a similar thing
> with the krc2 that was done with the k2?
> That seems a legitimate compromize to me. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2