BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Junior Lolley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:54:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
I am using a loop that is cut at 270 feet and it works great on 80 through 6
meters.


Junior Lolley KG4itd
Liberty County Emergency Coordinator


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Ron Yearns
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: antenna lengths

For some reason I remember reading, listening , to a few months old QST 
where they were saying the 468 didn't hold in all cases.  I also took 80 
meters times 39 and then divided by 12 and got within decimal points of the 
same numbers.  I know 39 inches isn't exactly the number of inches in a 
meter but amazing how close it came out.
Man using 1005 calls for 279 feet that's 19 feet longer than the other way. 
Almost a ten percent difference.
Maybe it's going to come down to cut and try with the antenna analyzer.
Ron
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walt Sebastian" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: antenna lengths


> Hi Ron,
> For some reason or another the formula for the loop is 1005 divided by
> frequency.  I hope this helps.
>
>
>
> Walt
> WA4QXT
> Groton CT
> [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2