BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Martin C. Tangora" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:15:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
It is well known, and not just legend, that human beings
are much taller now than in the past, but there have been
fluctuations over the centuries.
I Googled for about ten seconds and found

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height

where you see that men in the armed forces in the 19th century
were generally 5' 7" or shorter, and a cartoon site

http://lsned.com/facts/human-height/

of dubious reliability, which says that we were taller in 1000 AD
than in 1500 AD, without giving any sources.
(One footnote led to a 404 error.)
More detailed info, from measuring skeletons:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-528484.html

So there is food for both sides, but as far as North American history
is concerned, we are definitely taller than our forebears.

On 7/21/2012 1:03 PM, Cuyler Page wrote (and Ralph intercalated):
>
>         People were shorter then *Don't be so sure. Our furniture teacher at
>         Columbia told us that the Pharaohs' beds were short, not because "people
>         were shorter then" as we supposed, but because people slept sitting
>         up.*, and according to records and historic photos, at 5'-8" I would
>         have been a tall one here in 1900. *We have a group photo of the 30
>         ranchers and farmers who were the primary settlers here in the late
>         1800s.  One prominant rancher, with 15,000 acres and known to be a "big
>         man in town" was 4'-11".  The tallest man in the region, Moses Lumby, is
>         also in the photo and he was 5'-8".


-- 

Martin C. Tangora
tangora (at) uic.edu

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2