PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:20:04 -0700
Reply-To:
Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<000901cb7308$d3a0bb50$7ae231f0$@org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Shkabara <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Let's do some math. A 1.5G bit/sec translates to 192M Bytes/sec. Since most
hard drives I have seen tend to top out at about 60-70 MB/sec, even the 1.5G
cable has much room to spare!

Note that this is based on calculations. I don't have any measurement data
to refer to.

Peter Shkabara
-------------------------
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
Does anyone know if there will be a significant difference in performance
between a an internal HD SATA cable that works at 3G bits/sec and one that
works at 1.5 G bits/sec? Theoretically should be twice as fast but then
there is HD and buss speed to consider.

I bought three 1.5 G bit cables on-line because I was told they were the
fastest on the market, then I found the 3 G bit ones. I'm thinking not worth
the hassle to pay to send these  back and order the faster ones.

         PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at
                  http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2