Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:24:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
well i can tell you having had radios with both there is nothign wrong with sma in fact I have found sma connectors to e more rugged than bnc :) and they feel more solid ont he ht thanthe old bnc antennas that tended to wobble and wiggle around
On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Dan B Dyer Jr,/Danny wrote:
> Is there even any multiband HT that's made today that has BNC rather than
> SMA? Singlebanders, yes, but multibanders? I don't know of any. Danny.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 4:05 PM
> Subject: HT suggestions please
>
>
>> --=======AVGMAIL-331B0580=======
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> Hi everyone, I am thinking of purchasing a new HT. I think that my F6A =
>> has just about had it, and If I do decide to go a head and get a new one =
>> I want one with a BNC connector since all of my other radios have the =
>> BNC connector, and the F6A is the only one with SMA. Any suggestions =
>> would be helpful, and thanks in advance.
>> --=======AVGMAIL-331B0580=======
>> Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>> Content-Description: "AVG certification"
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3542 - Release Date: 03/31/11
>> 06:=
>> 34:00
>> --=======AVGMAIL-331B0580=======--
|
|
|