BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:04:10 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
It's TJ9PF from Cameroon on 3.789.  They will only be there a few more 
days, so everybody wants to grab them.

73, Steve KW3A



On 2/17/2011 7:18 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> Hi All:=20
>
> Any idea on which station is hogging the 80M phone DX window?=20
> I think its absolutely disgusting. The spread is between 3.79 and 3.796 =
> with the pile up splatter, it covers the window and begins around 3.789. =
> =20
> An Ea3 station begin working DX on 37.97 and was asked to QSY. I don't =
> know how these stations get away with it.=20
> The big 3 sponsors them and then they hog blocks of the bands and unless =
> you got 1KW and a large gain directional antenna, stay away. =20
> Why can't the splitting station just answer the callsigns it hears. =
> Aren't these 5G plus rigs supposed to be bullet proof? LOL=20
> =20
>
> 73:=20
>
> Michael De VO1RYN=20
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2