BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:01:14 -0230
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Digital CW VS Conventional
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Michael Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Hi all: 

Is there a difference in the sound of Digital CW, one that a program such as CW-type or HRD's DM-780, would transmit verses someone capable of sending 25/50WPM with a good set of paddles?  

73: 

Mike 
 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2