From what I understand, the latest cc radio isn't any better than the
earlier version. I was also told there is a connection on the back of the
cc radio sw for an option to receive ssb.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
> the ccradio sw can't receive sideband and I wouldn't recommend it as a
> shortwave receiver for that reason. The later model which has the 2-meter
> band replacing the channels 2-13 is a better choice.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:57 AM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>> Has anyone looked at the CCradio sw? It seems to have very good specs on
>> am.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>
>>>I agree, Tom. I have both the two and the three, also. I like them
>>> both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed.
>>> I'll
>>> take the super radios over them any day. I think the C Crane are way
>>> over
>>> priced. When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three for
>>> a
>>> really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at
>>> much
>>> higher prices, for me it is not worth it.
>>>
>>> Kris
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't
>>>> play
>>>> any more! (grin)
>>>>
>>>> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>>>>
>>>> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2, while
>>>> on
>>>> the 3, they are marginal.
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a 3 here. It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the one
>>>> to
>>>> have. The Secrane radios seem to perform well but I doubt they sound
>>>> as
>>>> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and
>>>> speaker.
>>>> Lou
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Wow, that is really troubling!
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.
>>
|