Thank You Sir, And Your Dear Companion Too, For All_ You Folks Are Super!
Rest Well! dd.
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking watch
> Hey, Danny:
>
> Thanks so much for the kind words.
>
> Brings a nice end to a very tough day!
>
> Onward we go from here, and boy, I'll really be happy when I get those HF
> antennas up!!!
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking watch
>
>
> Thanks Tom, I just had to laugh at your initial mroe spelling, and the way
> it lay in the text, I sure thought you intended it.
> I really respect you for all you are and all you do for us listers, and
> wouldn't intentionally give you a hard time at allDanny..----- Original
> Message -----
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking watch
>
>
>> Oh, of course, I knew that, Danny!
>>
>> Not at all a problem. In fact, I was laughing at myself when I read your
>> last post!!! (smile)
>>
>> We have to be able to rattle each other's chains every once in a while,
>> right?
>>
>> No offense whatsoever!!!
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking
>> watch
>>
>>
>> hey seriously, I thought you staged that for the sake of the phrase! I
>> promise, _No Offense Meant! Danny.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking
>> watch
>>
>>
>>> Ah, man, I can't write here, can I?
>>>
>>> Jeech!!!!!
>>>
>>> Think I may just go to bed and call it a day, but it's awful early yet,
>>> don't you think?
>>>
>>> Yikes!
>>>
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:41 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking
>>> watch
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tom, that was clasic, "As a college professor once again, I guess I
>>> need
>>> to be mroe careful
>>> " Best to you and yours in your new digs! Danny.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking
>>> watch
>>>
>>>
>>>> David:
>>>>
>>>> No, it is not a Braille watch.
>>>>
>>>> It's an atomic talking watch with hands and print markings for a visual
>>>> display.
>>>>
>>>> I meant also to say that the time indicated by the hands, and the time
>>>> verbally spoken do not correspond.
>>>>
>>>> As a college professor once again, I guess I need to be mroe careful
>>>> proofreading my writing, eh? (smile)
>>>>
>>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:50 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Off Topic: need recommendations for good atomic talking
>>>> watch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> Does your comment mean this is both a braille and a talking
>>>> watch? If so, I may want to look into getting one myself. I have a
>>>> Radio Shack talking watch which I don't use. hated not being able to
>>>> sneak a peak at my watch under the table during a boring staff meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Incidentally, did you mean to say the hands and spoken time did not
>>>> correspond?
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>>
>>>> Dave, W7OQ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At 09:33 AM 9/1/2010, you wrote:
>>>>>Hi, all.
>>>>>
>>>>>I know this is "off topic", so please respond off list.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>>>
>>>>>My Reizen talking atomic watch, which I have had now for probably five
>>>>>to
>>>>>7
>>>>>years, is starting to act flaky on me, so it looks like it might be
>>>>>time
>>>>>to
>>>>>replace it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can someone give me a good recommendation for a replacement talking
>>>>>watch?
>>>>>
>>>>>The Reizen that I have been using is ok, although I have found the
>>>>>support
>>>>>for the product to be less than satisfactory. For example, despite
>>>>>countless phone calls to Maxiaids (where I originally purchased the
>>>>>watch),
>>>>>I have never been able to solve a problem where the hands on the watch
>>>>>correspond with the spoken time.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for any suggestions, and 73 from Tom behler: KB8TYJ
|
