BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:16:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
My biggest thing is the lack of warranty, you're pretty well in trouble if 
one breaks. Yeah, you go buy another one but that can get costly if you only 
get a year or so out of them. Though after what happened with my first 
IC-t90 after a pretty bad fall, when it was going to cost more to fix than 
buy a new one, sometimes I wonder if we're any better off there but my new 
one has taken a couple falls just as good if not worse with the move and not 
had a problem so sometimes I wonder if that first one was just destined to 
break anyway.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: Christian's demo


> Thanks, Gary.  I am not currently in the market for any HT radio, but if 
> my
> only choices were the Wouxon or the Tit radio, I probably would choose the
> latter even though it is not everything we would like.  And like I have 
> said
> before, I wonder if the electronics are worth the savings.
> Harvey 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2