BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:03:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I just haven't seen anything from yaesu in years from the quality control, 
to performance, to accessibility, to design of anything that makes me want 
one, interested, or willing to go through the aggravation
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Ryan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 2:15 PM
Subject: Re_PS Question


> Hi John:=20
>
> Why does the PS-53 Yaesu combo give you a horrible feeling? (LOL)=20
> I think Yaesu products are equal to those of Icomm and any other of the =
> modern stuff available. Of course, the 2 best receivers I've ever heard =
> were a Yaesu FT-102, which I made my vary first HF contact on and my old =
> TS-940SAT.=20
> I don't think my new rig is going to come close by far to either but it =
> should be better than the 570. Just an opinion! LOL=20
> =20
>
> 73:=20
>
> Mike=20
> P S=20
>
> Best bang for the buck ratio was certainly another deciding factor and =
> the eham reviews show that.=20
> .=20 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2