BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 May 2010 08:41:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Personally I think the TS-2000 talks too much with the speech board in it, 
if the 480 does more than that it would go out the window if I had one.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:01 AM
Subject: Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?


> Hi,
> I am still thinking about the TS-2000 since I also want to have 2m and 
> 70cm=
> and the TS-480 only features shortwave and 50 MHz.
> But someone told me that it was more accessible, is this really true?
> Many thanks,
> Christian 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2