BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:23:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
    Dave:

I'm truly sorry that we didn't get to you quickly enough.

I'm actually thinking of revising the net script to take "short time" 
check-ins first, so that folks on a tight schedule can get in without having 
to wait too long and cause other problems for themselves or their families. 
We did this on many of the 2-meter FM nets I ran in Michigan, and I have 
also heard that out here in Colorado too.

Will put revising the net script to reflect this change on my things-to-do 
list.

See you next Sunday on 17, if the band co-operates with us.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: some thoughts on 17 meters for next week's net


Hi Tom,

I'm sorry I had to leave before my turn to make a transmission came
'round.  Another of my hobbies is playing mandolin.  Sunday
afternoons we often head to a British pub in Ashland to join in on a
Celtic fam.  If we go again next Sunday, I'll try to get on the list
earlier.  The frequency on 17 meters sounds good.

73,

Dave, W7OQ

At 03:20 PM 2/28/2010, you wrote:
>Hi, all.
>
>Well, the net was its usual success on 20 meters today, despite some very
>anoying QRM, and despite the fact that the band started to give out for our
>East Coast folks toward the end of the hour.
>
>Shortly after the net, a couple of us agreed to go up to 17 meters, and see
>what it was like up there.
>
>I never heard Kevin (K7RX), but did hear Betsey (K1EIC), and Gerry 
>(WB6IVF).
>If anyone else was in there, I did not hear you, so I apologize.  Please
>don't think I was ignoring you (grin).
>
>I was able to tune my Ameritron AL811H amplifier on 17 meters, and actually
>got good signal reports from Gerry and Betsey.  However, for some reason,
>running 500 watts or so on 17 meters creates RFI problems by setting off
>several smoke detectors, so I probably shouldn't volunteer to be net 
>control
>for next week-end's net, if we decide to try 17 meters.  I certainly can
>serve as a relay station, though, and will contribute whatever else I can 
>to
>the net, even if I have to run 100 watts.  (Yeah, I know, Kevin, that 
>ground
>rod will really help!  (smile)
>
>Given that 18.1575 is the HF backpackers' standard calling frequency, we
>probably would be best off going to 18.160.
>
>How does this all sound as a plan?
>
>P.S.  Toward the beginning of today's net, Steve (WA1RTB), Howard (WA9TOP),
>and Steve (KW3A) were louder than I have ever heard them, so 20 meters is
>definitely my  band of choice for any future nets beyond next Sunday, at
>least for a while.)
>
>73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ, Louisville, CO

ATOM RSS1 RSS2