Those studies have been dismissed elsewhere as specious insofar as the
authors confuse daily protein requirement in toto with amount necessary for
muscle growth.

As for training, I'm not interested in mimicking Paleo man by extolling him
as a 'noble savage' nor limiting myself by means of an ironic retro dietary
agenda poised in evolutionary transformationalist guise! We can certainly
move forward with emerging sciences rather than base onselves on
contemporary constructions of what might have been.

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:27:01 -0600, Ken O'Neill <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> May be "Paleo" but not smart in terms of nutrient timing promoting an
>> anabolic post-workout metabolic condition. Assuming some form of EPOC/HIIT
>> training, post workout combination of whey/l-leucine will optimize recovery
>> and adapative response.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I buy into that one.  See the study referenced in this blog
> post:
> http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009/11/10/how-much-protein-per-day-build-muscle/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LifeSpotlight+%28Fitness+Spotlight%29-- note particularly the section "But Post Workout Protein Makes More Muscle
> … Right?".
>
> As for whether or not it's paleo, I would actually argue that it is.  Paleo
> man had to hunt, run down, and kill his food, then carry or drag it back to
> camp.  So in fact, he did have a good workout followed by a good meal.
>  Paleo nutrient timing, so to speak.
>
> --
>  Robert Kesterson
>  [log in to unmask]
>