Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:53:14 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<F5.A9.23198.4A7087C4@louvi-msg> |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ed,
I had a TS2000 for a couple of years and traded it for an Icom
746PRO. The Icom isn't as accessible but more sensitive and
selective. Also, the Kenwood had a "digital" sound in receive and I
didn't particularly care for that. And, often I didn't operate for a
while and was a bit lost with all of the Kenwood controls!! That's
me and certainly no fault of Kenwood. But finally, my preference was
for the Icom which I since have replaced with an 756PRO III.
Hope this helps.
Pat, K9JAUAt 01:44 PM 8/27/2010, you wrote:
>I was wondering how satisfied owners are with this rig along side of others
>they have used? Selectivity, sensitivity and such, I hear the
>accessibility is good.
>I have a 480 so am somewhat familiar with this particular rig. Thanks and
>73. Ed K7UC
|
|
|