BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bowman, Camille (DHR)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:51:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Amen, Bro... 


Camille Agricola Bowman
Easement Technical Advisor
Tidewater Region Preservation Office
Department of Historic Resources
14415 Old Courthouse Way
Newport News, Virginia 23608
Tel: 757-503-1549 (NOTE: New Number)
Fax: 757-886-2808

 


-----Original Message-----
From: The listserv where the buildings do the talking
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Leeke
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 12:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [BP] And here's another one

> But is disposable housing economically undesirable?

Of course, disposable housing is economically desirable--for the
corporations that construct it and in the process will wring every cent
of value out of the earth and your life and my life, and the lives of
our children, and their children.

The only economic studies that conclude the disposable economy is good
depend on the corporate strategy of externalizing expenses. Damage to
the environment during manufacture and disposal of plastic and cardboard
siding--not included. Loss of the lives of our sons and daughters in
Iraq to secure the oil used to make the disposable plastic windows--not
included. The flat out waste of embodied energy when the fine old
Victorian down the street is ground up, hauled to the dump and replaced
with a disposable MacMansion--not included.

We don't need expert studies to determine what is practical and good. We
can look around us and do our own thinking. Does it make practical sense
(or not) to pick up a metal spoon that already exists, use it to eat
your breakfast and then wash it; or to go half-way around the world,
extract petroleum oil from underground, haul that oil back home, refine
it into plastic resin, haul that resin half-way across the continent,
form it into a plastic spoon, haul it across the continent again, go to
the store, haul it home, remove and dispose of the plastic wrapper it
came in, use the spoon once, throw it in the trash, and haul it to the
dump? How is it even possible to make that spoon so cheaply that we can
afford to throw it out? Because the corporations that make it are
externalizing most of the cost of making that spoon. The exact same
thing is now happening with plastic windows and entire houses. Each of
us can do our own thinking, and decide each morning how we will eat our
breakfast and how we will build and care for our houses.

knowledge, good judgment, wisdom

Like Leland says, "think global, act local."


John

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2