Well, thanks for the info, Colin, and the encouraging propagation
reports.
Really looking forward to the ARRL International DX SSB contest the first
week-end of March!
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: Question
>I also use WM7D.net for the solar flux index, as well as the A and K
> index...they are very nicely arranged in a one line text format on the
> page...no digging through graphs or trying to figure out random numbers.
> the url for that is:
> HTTP://www.wm7d.net/hamradio/solar/index.shtml
>
> speaking of which, all 3 indexes are in good shape today...and there is
> lots
> of 11M activity from all over north america into alberta...mostly east
> coast
> of the US at the moment.
> I checked 10, 15 and 17M but heard nothing...20 has a few rag chewers and
> a
> bit of european dx but nothing I could really make out all that well.
> a better antenna here would likely solve that problem.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Question
>
>
>> Gerry:
>>
>> According to our friend Kevin (K7RX), WM7D is a web site that can give
>> you
>> info similar to qrz, but is much more blind friendly, and easier to use.
>> I
>> haven't tried it yet, but will when I get the chance here.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Question
>>
>>
>> what is wm7?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 6:49 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Question
>>
>>
>>> Hi, all.
>>>
>>> Well, here's a post from me that ended up in Kevin's in-box again for
>>> some
>>> reason when I tried replying to the list.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Kevin for bringing this to my attention.
>>>
>>>
>>> See below.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:22 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Question
>>>
>>>
>>> Kevin and all:
>>>
>>> I am not familiar with WM7D. ... How does that compare with qrz?
>>>
>>> Anyway, my thinking is that I could provide a list of check-ins, based
>>> on
>>> the lists I have kept when I've been net control, if someone then wants
>>> to
>>> go to WM7D, or wherever, and get the addresses and other info.
>>>
>>> Just let me know if there are any takers for the WM7D part, and we'll go
>>> from there.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 9:16 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Question
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If someone had some time, you could use WM7D to look up the calls and
>>> put
>>> names with them. This could be built as we do the net and get new
>>> check-ins.
>>>
>>> Very 73.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kevin :)
>>> Amateur Radio: K7RX
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of tom behler
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 17:16
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Question
>>>
>>> Thanks for the quick response, Ken.
>>>
>>> Your attention to the list, and your great job of moderating is
>>> appreciated
>>> by me, and I'm sure, by everyone else.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ken Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 5:41 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Question
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have such a list myself. You can send the command:
>>>
>>> review blind-hams
>>>
>>> in an email to:
>>>
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> and it will send you back the list of subscribers to the list who don't
>>> have their information concealed, but basically we're only talking about
>>> names and email addresses. Some included their calls when they signed
>>> up,
>>> but not all, and of course not all are even hams presently, so the
>>> information would be of only limited value. Probably the simplest thing
>>> to do would be for those who wish to have such a list to take note of
>>> names and calls when provided in messages to the list, and develop their
>>> own rosters over time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ken,
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>
|