BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:10:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (144 lines)
I also use WM7D.net for the solar flux index, as well as the A and K 
index...they are very nicely arranged in a one line text format on the 
page...no digging through graphs or trying to figure out random numbers.
the url for that is:
HTTP://www.wm7d.net/hamradio/solar/index.shtml

speaking of which, all 3 indexes are in good shape today...and there is lots 
of 11M activity from all over north america into alberta...mostly east coast 
of the US at the moment.
I checked 10, 15 and 17M but heard nothing...20 has a few rag chewers and a 
bit of european dx but nothing I could really make out all that well.
a better antenna here would likely solve that problem.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: Question


>    Gerry:
>
> According to our friend Kevin (K7RX), WM7D is a web site that can give you
> info similar to qrz, but is much more blind friendly, and easier to use. 
> I
> haven't tried it yet, but will when I get the chance here.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Question
>
>
> what is wm7?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 6:49 PM
> Subject: Fw: Question
>
>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> Well, here's a post from me that ended up in Kevin's in-box again for 
>> some
>> reason when I tried replying to the list.
>>
>> Thanks to Kevin for bringing this to my attention.
>>
>>
>> See below.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: Question
>>
>>
>>    Kevin and all:
>>
>> I am not familiar with WM7D. ... How does that compare with qrz?
>>
>> Anyway, my thinking is that I could provide a list of check-ins, based on
>> the lists I have kept when I've been net control, if someone then wants 
>> to
>> go to WM7D, or wherever, and get the addresses and other info.
>>
>> Just let me know if there are any takers for the WM7D part, and we'll go
>> from there.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 9:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: Question
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> If someone had some time, you could use WM7D to look up the calls and put
>> names with them.  This could be built as we do the net and get new
>> check-ins.
>>
>> Very 73.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin :)
>> Amateur Radio:  K7RX
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of tom behler
>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 17:16
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Question
>>
>>    Thanks for the quick response, Ken.
>>
>> Your attention to the list, and your great job of moderating is
>> appreciated
>> by me, and I'm sure, by everyone else.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ken Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 5:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: Question
>>
>>
>> I don't have such a list myself.  You can send the command:
>>
>> review blind-hams
>>
>> in an email to:
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> and it will send you back the list of subscribers to the list who don't
>> have their information concealed, but basically we're only talking about
>> names and email addresses.  Some included their calls when they signed 
>> up,
>> but not all, and of course not all are even hams presently, so the
>> information would be of only limited value.  Probably the simplest thing
>> to do would be for those who wish to have such a list to take note of
>> names and calls when provided in messages to the list, and develop their
>> own rosters over time.
>>
>> --
>> Ken,
>> [log in to unmask]
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2