BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:24:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
    Howard:

Well, that idea, plus starting an additional echo-link net, are both 
floating around out there, so I'm just waiting to see how things sort 
themselves out.

My only concern would be to make sure that a separate echo-link net wouldn't 
somehow replace our Sunday afternoon cross-country blind ops SSB net.  I 
think most of us agree that both nets can exist simultaneously, and don't 
have to interfere with each other, which, in my view, is the best approach.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: echo link net


Did I miss something, I must have been sleeping.  I thought or at least
assumed, that the origional idea was to log in to an echo remote base and
use that to join the 20 meter net.  Maybe I got it wrong.
I'll see you on 20 meters, after the Packers win the Super bowl.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2