Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:27:00 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Butch:
That's a fair question.
My thinking is that, especially when you get higher up in frequency,
directionality becomes more possible if you can have dipoles that are
arranged perpendicular to each other.
I have heard of field day set-ups that operate on that basis.
I guess my thinking is that if I can't have a tower and beam again, I should
do whatever I can to maximize my potential for directionality where
possible.
Don't know how sound the theory is, but it seems at least worth a try.
If others disagree or question these assumptions, please let me know.
That's what this list is all about.
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: supports for wire antennas
I'm curious why you want two dipoles. It has been a long time since I
studied antenna theory, but on 80 meters, for example, isn't there only
about 3 db difference between broad side versis off the ends?
73
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
open Node 3148
Las Vegas
|
|
|