I have heard the same from other people.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?


> That's funny, another friend of mine who runs a TS-480 mobile, before
> putting it mobile compared it to his TS-2000 and said the TS-2000 was the
> better receiver and even had me over to show me and it was a slightly
> noticeable difference favoring the TS-2000.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?
>
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I've used both and I think the 480 is the better receiver.
>>
>> Very 73..
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin :)
>> Amateur Radio: K7RX
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:21, steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Just wondering if anyone has done a side by side  comparison of the
>>> TS-2000
>>> and the TS-480 on receive? I would like to get another HF rig in the
>>> shack.
>>> I'm willing to sacrifice some performance in favor of accessibility
>>> inherent
>>> with Kenwood, since I have no sighted  help here.  Rumors still
>>> abound of
>>> Kenwood debuting a new HF rig at Dayton in May,  but even if true,
>>> not sure
>>> I would want to be the first in line for a new model.
>>>
>>> I know the 480 requires optional filters, but is the 480 a noticeable
>>> improvement  on  rx?
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>