Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:59:30 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm not sure that digital signals like PSK31 will come through an internet
voice encoder very well. I haven't tried it, but when you are trying to
send tones through an encoder that expects voice, the results may not be
very good, especially when the signal is noisy.
I have copied a little PSK31 and RTTY using the DM780 program and
Window-Eyes 7.11. I had to put the mouse pointer in a particular spot, then
check the line frequently as new data came in, filled the line, then
scrolled upward in the window. I first had to tell DM780 which of the
signals it heard was the signal I wanted to decode. I have not transmitted
with this setup yet, and it doesn't look very ergonomic. And this is with a
direct connection through a Signalink USB to my FT-950.
73,
Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
Home: http://lras.home.sprynet.com
Work: http://www.loc.gov/nls
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: digital modes
>
> Hi list:=20
>
> Is anyone playing or has played with PSK31?=20
> If digipan and a screen reader wasn't used, then which program out there =
> might be suited with a screen reader.=20
> I did see that digipan was the preferred and it was mentioned on the =
> handiham site a couple of years ago and I have seen a couple of postings =
> to this list as well.=20
> I know that most of you are probably using jaws but if jaws can do it =
> than most likely WE can as well.=20
> We does have a jaws type curser that can be rooted around the screen if =
> that's what ya have to do.=20
> I just connected to my remote HF receiver and stream the audio over =
> skype to listen to some PSK.=20
> The digipan program did pick it up but again it made no sense. It was =
> garbled. =20
>
> Mike=20
|
|
|