Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:10:47 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin:
It's nice to have you back as well.
We will definitely stay clear of 14.260, now that I know it is a designated
IOTA frequency.
If someone had responded to my multiple quiries about whether the frequency
was in use when we began the net, I would have moved in a heartbeat.
But, that's neither here nor there, I guess; will avoid it from now on.
73 from Tom Behler: Kb8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: Net on or near 14.260
Hi All,
I've been out of town and just got back. We want to steer clear of 14.260
at all costs. That is fairly much internationally recognized as the IOTA
SSB frequency and we will incur a lot of wrath if we operate the net there.
Sorry I wasn't around to help. It's nice to be back. Very 73.
Kevin :)
Amateur Radio: K7RX
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of tom behler
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 13:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Net on or near 14.260
Guys:
It's a little tight, but I think 14.260 will work.
73 de KB8TYJ
|
|
|