BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ray t. mahorney" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ray t. mahorney
Date:
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:23:57 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
then there's the engineers view too many engineers I talked to said that 
IBOC after sun down was a bad idea and that's been borne out by real world 
experience which is why you are starting to see stations turn off either the 
upper or lower side band to avoid adjacent channel interference.  IBOC on AM 
was a bad idea and on FM it's not much better because you're not allowed to 
modulate those IBOC carriers at more than 5 percent of total transmitter 
power to avoid first and second adjacent interference issues.  as well as 
avoiding cross talk issues which would result from injecting those carriers 
too close to the 38 kHz stereo pilot frequency.  Over here in the UK they 
are planning to totally phase out AM by 2015 they are not planning to do any 
type of AM DAB over here but I am betting the 2015 date is going to be 
pushed back.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: clear channel stations, digital AM, and such


Yeah, there is the corporate radio view and then there is the true =
public's view.
Harvey
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Mike Freeman=20
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 3:15 PM
  Subject: Re: clear channel stations, digital AM, and such


  Er, um, perhaps there is more than one view or definition of what is =
in=20
  the public interest?

  Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2