BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:30:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Butch,

I have 2 high power tuners in the shack.  A manual from Palstar and a MFJ 
998 auto.   The manual tuner is easy to tune with the tone function in the 
LDG TW-1.  The auto tuner of course does it automatically and if interfaced 
to the rig with an optional cable, will  put the rig into cw mode and set 
the power to 5 watts before starting the tune cycle.   When tuned, the 
original mode and power settings are restored.

I would guess that the manual tuner is  more efficient, with a large roller 
inductor and 2 big caps, as opposed to the relay controlled auto tuner.
I've been happy with both, and would buy either one again, no problem.

73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: KAT1


> Speaking of tuners, I'm thinking of something that will handle a
> kilowatt.  Wondering what anyone could suggest, both manual versis
> automatic.
> 73
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
> open Node 3148
> Las Vegas
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Kallie Swanepoel wrote:
>
>> Any opinions on the KAT1. Is it a better tuner than the inline tuner of 
>> the
>> TS2000?
>>
>> 73
>>
>>
>> Kallie ZS6KCS
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2