BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:38:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Tnx to all for replies and comments.  For what it's worth, I've decided not 
to pull the trigger on the 480.  I would like a new rig in the shack by 
summer's end,  so I'm in no big rush.  If I'm going to spend the money and 
invest time and effort in getting used to a new radio, I'd like it to give 
me some real improvement in some areas.  The K3 interests me, but  lot's of 
money for a rig that isn't as accessible as I need.    I'll sit tight and 
see if anything pops up at Dayton or thereafter.

73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?


> When you read the specs, you'd think the ts480 was slightly better.  Specs
> aren't ears, however.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2