BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:52:51 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (125 lines)
Ain't those 1 by 1 call signs used for special events fun to work?  I don't 
know why but I always enjoy working those, too.  I heard a European for 
awhile last winter on 30 meters and his call was LX1000 and another letter 
or two as a suffix.  I forget what the whole call was now but it had the 
number 1000 in it.  I really have fun working even the special call signs in 
Canada and just about anywhere.  Of course, The royal family of Jordan used 
to use J1 J2 J3 and so on and those were fun to work back in the early 
eighties when they were active on sideband.  J1 of course, was King Hussein. 
That isn't how you spell it, I don't think, but you know, the same middle 
name our president has.

Phil.
[log in to unmask]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Albert Sanchez" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Band Conditions


> Hi All
> I worked w 0 O Special event station from Frankenstine MO on 7045 at 1800
> EDT tonight, weak but readable.
> 73, Albert, W A 7 F X B / 4
> Greenville NC
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Band Conditions
>
>
>>    Phil:
>>
>> Well, if we hang in there, increased solar activity will come.
>>
>> We just happen to be at the bottom of the cycle still, and, as far as I
>> can
>> remember, the bottom of this cycle has been especially long.
>>
>> Maybe that will mean the peak will be long too.
>>
>> Here's hoping!
>>
>> 73 from Tom NBehler:  KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: Band Conditions
>>
>>
>> It sure sounds like something like a flare but I don't follow the reports
>> like I used to.  I just tune the bands, check the beacon frequencies, and
>> can easily tell what's going on with most of the bands that way.  I got 
>> my
>> novice and general about 6 months apart back in 1966.  Early in 1967, I
>> started getting on 20, 15, and 10 meters.  Man, I worked thousands,
>> literally, thousands of DX stations that last half of the sixties just
>> running about 150 watts output with my Drake TR4, wire antennas, and a
>> little 3 element tri bander at 28 feet on the roof.  In the early
>> eighties,
>> I had a 4 element 20 meter beam only at 40 feet but in one year, mixing
>> sideband and CW together on 20 meters, and running 700 watts output with
>> an
>> old Heathkit Warrior, 4 811A amp, I worked 295 countries just in that one
>> year on that one band.  Worked 20 meter long path every morning and got
>> Russians and Europeans giving me literally 50 over S9 reports at times.
>> That was back in the days you had to work around the wood pecker, too.
>> Then
>> in the early nineties, with my 2 element 40 meter beam at 70 feet, and
>> running 1,000 watts output, I worked stuff on 40 I never knew was
>> possible.
>> First Russian sideband signal I work during a CQ Worldwide phone contest
>> was
>> literally 40 over 9.  I actually checked my band switch because I thought
>> I
>> was on 20 instead by mistake, haw.  These kind of conditions makes the HF
>> ham dream of more sunspot activity; lots more.
>>
>> Phil.
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: Band Conditions
>>
>>
>>>    Hey, Phil:
>>>
>>> That's interesting.  At first, I thought the snow did in my dipole, but
>>> my
>>> swr's are still good.  Wonder if there was a solar flare or something.
>>>
>>> The bands really shouldn't be this crappy, given what people have been
>>> telling me over the last few days.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:42 PM
>>> Subject: Band Conditions
>>>
>>>
>>> Tuned 17 meters mid morning and copied some side band activity, nothing
>>> strong, and heard a few CW signals including a couple of weak Europeans
>>> and
>>> a few stateside signals.  By afternoon, every band I tuned was terribly
>>> weak.  I normally, no matter how bad the conditions are, hear at least
>>> one
>>> or two S9 signals at the least.  Not today; all day.
>>>
>>> Phil.
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2