Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:27:15 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is rather a lot of evidence in favour of the notion that carbohydrates were eaten in moderate amounts in palaeo times:-
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/71/3/682
And, of course, carbohydrate-consumption would have varied considerably among humans, with carb-intake increasing the further one went towards the equator, for obvious reasons, and vice-versa.
The primary reason why meat-intake has been focused on more than plant-food-intake in palaeo times has been solely due to the fact that evidence of meat-intake(ie bones) is much easier to find. By contrast, plant-remains are extremely perishable, unlike bones, so it is far more difficult to determine the true plant-intake of ancient hominids. That said, as science has progressed, there has been more research into this issue. For example, there was a recent study on Neanderthal teeth that showed that Neanderthals did indeed eat some plants along with a wide variety of animal foods, whereas previous studies had suggested they only ate meats from large mammals.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
|
|
|