BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:34:33 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
It does cover 80 through 10 m.
I don't have an antenna that is designed for 80 m, guess that's why I forgot 
the amp will work there.
I can get the R7 to tune up on 80 but haven't tried making any contacts 
there.
I'm afraid to put 100 watts through the R7 on that band let alone any power.
I don't want to hurt anything.
Thanks, and 7 3.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: re_heathkit SB-220 questions


> Something very odd there.  No sb220 excluded 80 meters.  That one must 
> have
> been in the hands of a cb guy and modified.  Should work fine on A.M. I
> wouldn't push it past around 250 watts input.  Those tubes aren't cheap, 
> and
> the signal gain isn't worth any risk.  You might get around 110 watts
> carrier out, which is 440 watts PEP.  Should do you well.  Some of the 
> guys
> doing this might have better advice.  Mine is very conservative.
> Hope to hear you on 1880 or 3985.  I'll fire up the valiant. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2