BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 22:42:16 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
Hi John.

I admit that the TS830S has a fabulous receiver.  It was probably the best 
radio in that era.  I used one when our local radio club ran a station for 
the Initernational Lighhouse & Light Ship Weekend a few years ago, and it 
was a great sounding radio.

My point, though, was that having lived through that era and having done 
all the things one had to do to use that generation of radio, I wouldn't 
choose to go back when I can push a button and I know exactly what 
frequency I'm on, at least out to 10 Hz resolution, and I can push another 
button and the thing is all tuned up.  I admit I'm spoiled because I also 
prefer the newer shortwave receivers where I know what frequency I am on to 
the old ones where I had to make a kind of guestimate, and sometimes that 
guestimate wasn't very good.

73, de Crazy Lou, K2LKK



At 08:15 PM 4/5/2009 -0400, you wrote:
>OK crazy. (you did say call you crazy) anyway, I like my TS-830 as the
>backup. I'd never use a yaesu due to their attitude and lack of quality
>control, but I'll try any radio other than theirs and probably alinco once.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:55 PM
>Subject: Re: Computer interface for the Kenwood TS-50.
>
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > That maybe true, but after having used some of the modern accessible rigs,
> > I wouldn't choose to go back to the way things were.  Call me crazy, but I
> > like to spend my time working stations, not trying to cope with my rig.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > At 05:35 AM 4/3/2009 -0400, you wrote:
> >>John, I agree with you.  A radio without synthesizer can be quite
> >>cumbersome
> >>at first but it can become very usable after some use.  It will take a
> >>little trial and error but you can use it until you can do better.
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:01 PM
> >>Subject: Re: Computer interface for the Kenwood TS-50.
> >>
> >>
> >> >I don't know if it has it either, but it's something to look in to. If
> >> >not,
> >> > really, I find even if you're stuck with nothing, once you get a feel
> >> > for
> >> > the radio and the bands, you can come very close to where you want to
> >> > be.
> >> > I
> >> > can honestly, on my 830, after about 5 minutes to get used to it again,
> >> > put
> >> > that thing very close to dead on where I want to be and more often than
> >> > not
> >> > I can actually do it with out anyone being there to tune in to. It's
> >> > just
> >> > a
> >> > case of practice. I rather have the voice read out or something, but as
> >> > you
> >> > learn where the birdies are on the bands, the group that's on all the
> >> > time
> >> > playing with audio, the group picking on each other, really it's not
> >> > impossible to work with the radio and have a good idea where you are on
> >> > the
> >> > bands you use most.
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:01 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: Computer interface for the Kenwood TS-50.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Hi John, thanks for the idea of putting the lower band edge in a
> >> >> memory.
> >> >> I will definitely do that.
> >> >> I don't know if the TS-430 has a signal generator. I didn't see
> >> >> anything
> >> >> about it in the manual.
> >> >> I'll check again, I may have over looked it.
> >> >> Thanks again for your help and 73.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>Checked by AVG.
> >>Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.42/2042 - Release Date: 4/5/2009
> >>10:54 AM
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.42/2042 - Release Date: 4/5/2009 
>10:54 AM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2