Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:40:57 -0500 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
William:
Is your response rhetorical? Frankly, I for one would appreciate an earnest
response rather than a non sequitar. As for neighbor's reactions, I am
reminded of Bishop Berkeley's mandate to speak with the vulgate and think
with the learned.
> [Original Message]
> From: william <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 7/17/2009 8:31:14 PM
> Subject: Re: zucchini
>
> Andrea Hughett wrote:
> >
> > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Bill Wilcox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Sorry. Zucchini is NOT paleo.
> >>
> >
> > Hmmmm....edible raw, neither grain, tuber, legume, nor sugar, and
> > given that NONE of the vegetables we eat are identical to their wild
> > forebears, I fail to understand why New World plants with Old World
> > relatives should be out of the running. What is your reasoning on
> > this one?
> >
>
> Ask any small boy.
> It's not food, you can also check your neighbours' reaction when you
> come with wheelbarrows of the stuff, trying to give it away. :)
>
> William
|
|
|