INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:46:21 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Lars Rosenmeier <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Juhasz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
> Seriosemente, quanto a "haber" pote alcuno me dicer proque Gode ha electe
> "haber" e non "haver" (proque le sol explication io pote poner es que illo
> (le election) era un acte *subjective* in vice de uno scientific).


Io pensa que il debe esser proque le ancestro commun del parola in tote le
linguas fonte es "haber(e)" o alco simile.

Il ha ya iste regula remarcabile que on non pote simplemente usar un parola
in le forma que illo ha in tres linguas fonte, ma debe "ir al ancestro
commun". (Un regula que face interlingua plus simile a latino e *minus*
simile al linguas moderne e dunque plus difficile a comprender pro
non-interlinguistas/non-latinistas.) :/

Amicalmente,
Lars

--
http://falcatorrosa2.blogspot.com

Interlingua - proque nos ama linguas!

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2