Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:06:37 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ah, the point is that dogs and wolves are roughly the same size overall, but wolves still have a larger brain for their size. OK, some dogs are severely inbred so are a lot smaller or bigger per se, but the idea is that, if one adopts the brain-size to body ratio measurement-aspect of intelligence, wolves have a far higher such ratio and are therefore far more intelligent than dogs, quite aside from studies showing a higher intelligence for wolves. A higher intelligence is, logically, a surer sign of a chance at survival than anything else. To give an example, there are a number of humans, with a sizeable brain, who are, unfortunately, severely mentally-retarded who could not possibly survive at all without lots of access to advanced technology and the manifold resources of an advanced civilisation.
Geoff
>
> Since when is brain size a sole determinant of survival?
>
> Jim
|
|
|