Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:51:27 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
<015601cd4342$daa87cb0$8ff97610$@ca> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I disagree. Fumento clearly makes some good points, and even Taubes has admitted that one of the claims attributed to him by the media was exaggerated. And, as I pointed out before, it isn't only Fumento who is against Taubes but also Stephan Guyenet( a palaeo enthusiast) and others?
"God is on the side of the big battalions":- In other words, the more studies are made backing one viewpoint, the more credibility that viewpoint has; a tiny few studies, however rigorous, do not inspire confidence.
Re Aborigines:- This is quibbling. I had pointed out that the whole palaeolithic era was 2.5 million years ago, so 40,000 years ago would indeed have been the tail-end of the Palaeolithic era.
|
|
|