On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:59:54 -0600, Ken O'Neill <[log in to unmask]>  
wrote:
>
> ... bespeaks a paucity of intellectual fortitude. ...
> ... compatible with the ramblings of The Flat Earth Society! ...
> ... Frankly, such a view is intellectual rubbish ...
> ...
> The claim "processed supplements are viewed as non-Paleo" is likewise
> rubbish, ...

I'm sure you realize that you are addressing a group.  Most members of  
that group have chosen not to debate you on these issues, or perhaps not  
even to read your posts at all.  I am now joining them in that decision,  
not because your arguments are beyond debate, but because you insist on  
taking a tone that is obnoxious and condescending.  Perhaps you consider  
these posts merely "passionate", but they definitely do not come across  
that way.  I always enjoy and welcome intelligent discussion, but you seem  
as firmly rooted in your own dogma as you accuse others of being.  This is  
starting to look an awful lot like a religious argument -- and those  
almost never benefit anyone.  I can't speak for other list members,  
obviously, but personally, I'm simply not going to discuss anything with  
you unless you act a bit more civil.

--
   Robert Kesterson
   [log in to unmask]