We've got to stay away from 14.313, though, because I think that' some
sort of national calling frequency.
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
Yeah, that's my understanding.
If we try 20, I've found about 14314 or so to be pretty clear. I really
like
about 14156 but that's out of the general's band area.
Tom
Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, tom behler wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:24:05 -0600
> From: tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>
> 7182 would work, since, I think Generals can now go down to 7175. Is
> that correct?
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>
>
> At least in my area, 7190 is pretty much always busy. Its the HHH net
> frequency, there's some digital mode group that uses it, and it seems to
> be
> pretty popular. Might think about somewhere around 7182 or so.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
|