Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:51:49 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tom,
As long as you are still in the looking stage, take a peak at the
Carolina Windom made by Radio Works:
http://www.RadioWorks.Com That's what I am seriously
considering for low band coverage to supplement my quad.
73,
Dave, W7OQ
At 05:18 PM 6/29/2009, you wrote:
>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Howard:
>
>Well, because of what you and others are saying, including quite a few less
>than positive reviews of the B and W on e ham, I am now leaning toward the
>Alpha Delta DXCC. I also am looking at the Cobra Light line of antennas,
>although I think they might be a bit long for the property lot we'll be
>renting out in Colorado.
>
>Will keep you posted.
>
>73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:01 AM
>Subject: Re: Alpha Delta DXCC VS. B and W D-90?
>
>
>Tom I have used the Alpha Delta at field day and it is very good. Just run
>a wire from the center to ground, if the model you have requires that. I
>have also had the B&w, and it is a terrible antenna, on 80 meters. Most of
>the power is absorbed rather than radiated. Who cares if you see a flat
>SWR, you see one on a dummy load as well. How well does that radiate?
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0======="
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Description: "AVG certification"
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.94/2208 - Release Date: 06/29/09 0=
>5:54:00
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0=======--
>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======--
|
|
|