BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Schulte <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:32:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
I'm sorry, I didn't know that they went for that cheap brand new.  I thought 
that radio had a TNC installed in it, and that would have made it a bit more 
pricy.  I also was unaware that it didn't have tule recieve.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: used kenwood 707a


> The TMG707A sold for like $300 totaled up with the voice board in it new 
> and
> has been out of production for 2 or 3 years now, I'd think mint, you'd 
> have
> to work to get $200 for it. I've seen very few of them on the used market
> and generally in the $175 to $190 range. I still have mine in my go kit 
> and
> as a spare radio, I may put it mobile someday soon, that radio served me
> well. Anyway, that's about all it's worth used I'd think and that $200 
> would
> be mint and you'd probably have to work to get it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 11:59 AM
> Subject: used kenwood 707a
>
>
>> Hi;
>> I have a used kenwood 707a which has the speech board installed.  The =
>> unit has had very little use.  Anyone have any idea what it would be =
>> worth these days?  I have been out of touch and don't have a firm idea.
>> If I go the ts2000 route it might be surplus.  I kind of hate parting =
>> with it in that it speaks the p/l tone which makes setting up a repeater 
>> =
>> in memory infinitely easier.
>> I haven't used it in more than a year; I wonder if I'd remember how?
>> Richard 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2