Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:48:00 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert,
I'm glad you found the comparison of those antenni interesting. Perhaps
some of the rest of us would find your observations to be interesting as
well. I know that I would be interested. After all, isn't the purpose of
an e-mail list about ham radio supposed to be the sharing of information
about such things?
Thanks in advance for your interesting and helpful sharing,
73 Bob KD8IXD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Clark" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:42 PM
Subject: Radio question
First, during our local weekly net, I swapped the antennas on my TH F6A.
It was interesting to note the difference between the duckie, Diamond SRH
320A and the vertical. Since conditions were the same, it was a good test.
Now, there is a repeater about 50 some miles away, with some rugged
terrain in between. They hold nightly nets and I would love to participate
but while they come in rather well, being hearing impaired, there's just a
bit too much background for me.
Question is, is it all in the antenna, or is the handheld not quite up
to the task of filtering out that background? Eventually I will get another
rig for base but its gonna be a while.
*---* *---* *---* *---* *---*
Let Me Meat Your Needs.
--sign in a butcher's shop
Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
E-mail-
[log in to unmask]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
|
|
|