BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bob J." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:48:00 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Robert,

I'm glad you found the comparison of those antenni interesting.  Perhaps
some of the rest of us would find your observations to be interesting as
well.  I know that I would be interested.  After all, isn't the purpose of
an e-mail list about ham radio supposed to be the sharing of information
about such things?

Thanks in advance for your interesting and helpful sharing,

73   Bob   KD8IXD


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Clark" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:42 PM
Subject: Radio question


    First, during our local weekly net, I swapped the antennas on my TH F6A.
It was interesting to note the difference between the duckie, Diamond SRH
320A and the vertical.  Since conditions were the same, it was a good test.

    Now, there is a repeater about 50 some miles away, with some rugged
terrain in between.  They hold nightly nets and I would love to participate
but while they come in rather well, being hearing impaired, there's just a
bit too much background for me.

    Question is, is it all in the antenna, or is the handheld not quite up
to the task of filtering out that background?  Eventually I will get another
rig for base but its gonna be a while.

*---*  *---*  *---*  *---*  *---*
Let Me Meat Your Needs.
 --sign in a butcher's shop
Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
E-mail-
[log in to unmask]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2