BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:24:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
    Kevin:

I didn't realize it was being run by Canadian folks.

Not that this means anything in particular;  it's just something I didn't 
know.

So, no negative reflection on our Canadian friends. ...

It's just interesting information to store away somewhere in case someone 
asks me about it someday.

73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


I knew John would make a comment a soon as I saw this thread. Anyhow it's
just another VOIP thing like echolink. Only they charge for it. Also once
again it's another thing put out by Canadians. Sort of how IRLP started.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


    Well, John, I am sure you're not alone in your opinion. ...  And, I too
have reservations about it, which is probably the best reason I can think of
as to why I never heard of or tried it.

I just wanted to be sure I somehow wasn't missing something.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


it's a fraudulent site, they claim you're on the air when in fact your not
and it costs money if you can imagine that. Personally I think it's worse
than echolink and anyone using it should lose their licenses permanently but
that's probably not going to happen.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:12 PM
Subject: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


> Hi, all.
>
> The following thoughts are from a blind friend I have who isn't subscribed
> to the list, but who is an active ham nonetheless.
>
> He mentions something called CQ100.
>
> I've never heard of it, and wonder if anyone else has.
>
> Here's what he says about it:
>
>
> Hi Tom,
> I have got a place for the blind hams net.
> What about using cq100?
> You get all 5 hf bands, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters.  No qrm, and no sun
> spots to worry about.
> I worked all over north America and dx on 20, and 40, using it.
> You and everybody can find it at
>
>
> http://www.qsonet.com
>
>
> 73 de WD8OEP

ATOM RSS1 RSS2