BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:20:45 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
I heard about that yesterday, apparently it prompted county officials to 
issue a statement stating that it is not true because they were getting so 
many calls about it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:11 AM
Subject: Fw: [W4OVH] Bad April Fools Joke


> Thought Some Might Like To Know About This. Danny.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David A. Lane" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "OVH Mailing List" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:38 AM
> Subject: [W4OVH] Bad April Fools Joke
>
>
>
> From the League:
>
> It was a bad April Fool joke.  I did not want to put out an announcement
> on this here because I did not want to elevate it in any way.  But a few
> too many people have asked if it was true (it's NOT) - and some have
> gotten themselves all worked up.  So.
>
> Radiobanter.com website seems to have been the first place where someone
> posted an announcement that began with:
>
> "San Luis Obispo county supervisors took drastic and unprecedented action
> yesterday by passing an ordinance that would prohibit amateur radio
> operators, known as "hams", from operating their transmitting stations.
> The measure was put in place to eliminate what officials said were
> health risks associated with transmitters located close to children."
>
> It is NOT true.  Not only that, the newspaper cited in the article is
> looking at taking legal action against the author and the county
> officials are not amused by it.  Too many hams are overreacting without
> thinking or checking and it is causing troubles.  The website pulled the
> listing, but now ham related email reflectors are passing it on.
>
> If you hear about this - kill the rumors.  It was only a bad April Fool
> joke.
>
> Allen G Pitts, W1AGP
> Media & PR Manager
> ARRL - the national association for Amateur Radio
> 225 Main St.    Newington    CT    06111
> (860)  594-0328
> [log in to unmask]
> -- 
> David A. Lane, KG4GIY
> EC/RO Prince William County ARESŪ/RACES
> +1.703.628.3868
> http://www.pwcares.org/
> IM/Skype/Twitter: kg4giy
>
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ole Virginia Hams, Amateur Radio Club" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [log in to unmask]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/w4ovh?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2