Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 May 2008 05:29:59 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paleogal wrote:
>
> My point is this, these runners are outside in fresh air, doing a circuit
> training. They're not running as we do. There are numerous people out
> running on the street with the traffic and air pollutants or on a treadmill
> in the gym. Most don't have nature trails on which to run, no rivers to
> cross, or hills/mountains to scramble up.
Most people don't eat paleo, either. They *could*, they just choose not
to. It's the same with running. If people want to run in a natural
environment, odds are they can. I've only lived in three cities (Los
Angelos California, Dallas Texas, and Springfield Missouri). But in all
three of them, I could run in nature. Springfield and Dallas both have
nature centers with trails, and LA had beaches and national parks (maybe
nature centers, too -- I never bothered looking). All of those were
free for the public to use.
> We'll agree to disagree. Oliva
I don't disagree with you. Running in the environment you describe is
probably doing people more harm than good. I just think the problem is
more the environment than the running itself.
--
Robert Kesterson
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|