Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:30:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi.
900 MHz is something I'd like to try at some point. I'm not sure that
anybody is doing anything but weak signal in the Rochester, NY area, but if
a half dozen of us got on FM, it could be fun--not many listening there!
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 09:46 PM 4/22/2009 -0400, you wrote:
>That depends on if that band is active near you. Remember generally 1.2 gig
>equipment is extremely expensive, and knowing what it takes to get on 900
>MHz, I'd say 1.2 gig probably needs better coax, or more likely hard line to
>get a signal out so it's not a cheap band to get on. I didn't bother because
>there's no activity anywhere near me on that band. Seeing what 900 MHz has
>cost me and how that's grown in Massachusetts, CA and a couple other states
>lately due to the very cheap cost, I think it was a great decision. I would
>say base it on what there is around you for activity though, also there is a
>little satellite activity on 1.2 gig I believe so you might consider that,
>but again, you probably need some pretty good hard line considering LMR400
>at 900 MHz will cost you about half your power at 100 feet, 1.2 is probably
>even worse.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert Clark" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:30 PM
>Subject: TS-2000 models
>
>
> > I know there are 2-3 models of the 2000. One of you guys got the X
> > model which has the 1.2gHz band. Is the extra cost worth it? I have this
> > on my wish list but no telling how it will be.
> >
> > *---* *---* *---* *---* *---*
> > If you want the rainbow, you gotta put up with the rain.
> > -- Steven Wright
> > Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
> > E-mail-
> > [log in to unmask]
> > Home Page-
> > http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|