Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:39:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello all,
Sunday would be better for me, less hassle from the XYL.
John KC2QJB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lloyd Rasmussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: bh net on 40
>I can probably make it at that time; this coming Sunday night (local time)
> would have been better. I suggest 7195 KHz, because my cursory
> examination
> from time to time has not found broadcast stations. I think that the
> cut-off for the Advanced license is 7175, but I could be wrong. But the
> skip is going to be much longer than it was on 75 meters unless there
> happens to be a sporadic-E cloud passing overhead. Skip distance is
> likely
> to be at least 700 miles. My 40 dipole is not quite as effective as the
> 80,
> but some of you should be able to hear my 100 watts.
> 73,
>
> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
> Home: http://lras.home.sprynet.com
> Work: http://www.loc.gov/nls
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Steve
>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:18 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: bh net on 40
>>
>> How about 0000Z on Saturday, January 10. This would be 7PM January 9 in
>> the
>> Eastern zone, 6PM Central. I would be willing to give a shot at running
>> the
>> net; I'll have to check the band for a good freq in the General section
>> away
>> from foreign broadcasts.
>>
>> Steve, K8SP
>
|
|
|