Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:10:15 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No problem, Fred, Junior and I just concluded a great qso.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Steve Forst
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: bh net
Ron,
Sorry you weren't strong enough to get you into the mix. I probably heard
you as well as anyone, and that wasn't too good. I think the suggestions
that you and others have made to try 40 is a good one. Not only for larger
area coverage, but more folks are likely to have good antennas for 40 than
80.
Both you and Howard seemed to be on the fringe for most of us.
73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron & Denise Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: bh net
> I'm monitoring the net frequency and I'm hearing stations but everyone is
> weak,hard to read.
>
>
> Ron Miller
> N6MSA
> Clearwater, Fl. U.S.A.
> SKYPE arjay1
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: bh net
>
> The next blind hams net will be Sunday evening January 04.
> Time 23-00 Z. Frequency 3830 Lower Sideband. If this won't work for you,
> start your own net for your area of the world.
>
|
|
|