Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:25:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hmmm, I thought that was the Wilson tower. If so, I had one some twenty-five
years ago. You could get a mast mount for the rotor and mount the rotor on
the top of the tower. Then, you could put a small tribander and maybe a
two-meter beam on a mast on the other end of the rotor.
Steve, K8Sp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jennifer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: from Jennifer to Pat
It helps but I thought you did not need the rotor except for the antenna. I
thoguht the tower tilted over and cranked up and down with out the rotor.
This tower is something different that I had learned about. s I was
comfused about that. So if I take the rotor off for instance and use it on
the other tower that would not work.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: from Jennifer to Pat
> Jennifer,
> The rotator is mounted at the base of the tower. And the base of the
> tower is mounted to a bearing which supports the tower and the
> antenna which is bolted to its top. So, when you rotate you are
> actually rotating the tower with the antenna attached. Does that help?
> patAt 03:04 PM 11/4/2008, you wrote:
>>Hi Pat I have a question about he towser. someone was looking at it and =
>>trying to tell me what it looks like and so on. If I understood right =
>>the tower has to have the rotor to move it around? I thought the rotor =
>>was for the antenna and that was it. I thought the tower had it's own =
>>way of moving.
|
|
|